青云英语翻译

选择语言:从 语种互换 检测语种 复制文本 粘贴文本 清空文本 百度查找
翻译结果1翻译结果2翻译结果3翻译结果4翻译结果5
As policy implications, most families now have only one child, these are good and bad, the benefits of the economic burden not so heavy, the downside is that children are very lonely, no one accompanied the play did not compete, and only family to accommodate. Our parents seldom accompany their chil
Due to the policy implications, now most families to one child only, which is good and bad, the benefits of not so heavy burden on the economy, the downside is that children are so lonely, no one accompany played no competitive, only family accommodation. Our very few parents with their children so
As a result of the policy influence, the present major part family only lives a child, these have good and is not good, advantage to economic burden not that heavy, the fault is the children very is all lonely, nobody accompanies is playing has not competed, only then the family member gives in.Our
Now, thanks to policy impact on the majority of the families will only give birth to a child, and these are good and bad, the benefits of economic burden, it wasn't heavy disadvantages are children are very lonely, but no one who accompanied the playing with no competition, only family accommodation
Due to the policy implications, now most families to one child only, which is good and bad, the benefits of not so heavy burden on the economy, the downside is that children are so lonely, no one accompany played no competitive, only family accommodation. Our very few parents with their children so
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate]