青云翻译

Results: (1) the observation group were cured 32 cases, effective in 16 cases, total effective rate was 92.3%; control group, 21 cases markedly effective in 22 cases, total effective rate was 81.1%. Total effective rate were significantly different (p <0.01), with statistical significance. (2) th

Results: (1) Observer Group having an effect in 32 cases, effective 16 cases, total effective rate is 92.3%; control group having an effect in 21 cases, effective 22 cases, with a total effective rate of 81.1%. Two groups total effective rate significant difference (P<0.01), with statistical sign

Finally: (1) observation group shows results 32 examples, the effective 16 examples, the total effectiveness is 92.3%; The control group shows results 21 examples, the effective 22 examples, the total effectiveness is 81.1%.Two group of total effectiveness comparison difference remarkable (P<0.01

Results: ( 1) The apparent effect 32 laws, legislation, effective 16 to 92.3 % effective; contrast group apparent effect 21 laws, legislation, effective 22 to 81.1 % effective. Two groups (P total efficient comparison vary significantly, <0.01 ) with a statistically. ( 2) The Observer Group and t

Results: (1) Observer Group having an effect in 32 cases, effective 16 cases, total effective rate is 92.3%; control group having an effect in 21 cases, effective 22 cases, with a total effective rate of 81.1%. Two groups total effective rate significant difference (P<0.01), with statistical sign