青云翻译

In 2005, UGG questioned the validity of the trademark in federal court in California, the court ruled that Dirks, indicating that consumers in the United States UGG is a brand name [19] In his final order, the judge said the defendant general long-term use of hearsay evidence, but Dexter said by foo

2005, UGG trademark of validity made questioned, in California of Federal Court, Court ruled de grams Republika, description in United States of consumer think UGG is a brand name [19] in he of last command, judge said, accused provides has long-term of General using of rumors evidence, but de grams

In 2005, the UGG trademark validity proposes the question, in the California state federation court, the court rules Dircks, explained in US's consumers thought UGG is brand name [19] in his last-minute order, judge said, the defendant has provided the long-term general use hearsay evidence, but Dir

正在翻译，请等待...

2005, UGG trademark of validity made questioned, in California of Federal Court, Court ruled de grams Republika, description in United States of consumer think UGG is a brand name [19] in he of last command, judge said, accused provides has long-term of General using of rumors evidence, but de grams