青云英语翻译

选择语言:从 语种互换 检测语种 复制文本 粘贴文本 清空文本 百度查找
翻译结果1翻译结果2翻译结果3翻译结果4翻译结果5
To Socrates, the soul as a spiritual entity essentially different substances. According to Socrates, the generation and destruction of things, but something of aggregation and dispersion. Spiritual and material such clear opposition to become the founder of the history of Western philosophy idealist
Socrates clearly the spirit as the soul is the essence and substance of different entities. In Socrates, and destruction of, is just something that aggregated and distributed. He is so clearly against the spirit and substance, as founder of the philosophy of idealism in the history of Western philos
Regards as to Socrates the soul is only then explicitly has with the material the essential different energetic entity.Looked like in Socrates that, the thing production with perishes, but is some kind of thing polymerization and the disperser.He is clear about like this the spirit and the material
To Socrates, is clearly seen as the soul and the material of a different nature spirit entities. The Socrates seems to be as a result, things die, but it is a thing of the aggregation and dispersion. He will be spiritual and material so clearly opposite to Western philosophy, a history of the founde
Socrates clearly the spirit as the soul is the essence and substance of different entities. In Socrates, and destruction of, is just something that aggregated and distributed. He is so clearly against the spirit and substance, as founder of the philosophy of idealism in the history of Western philos
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate] 
[translate]